{"id":4605,"date":"2015-04-15T08:00:00","date_gmt":"2015-04-15T15:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/markwatches.net\/reviews\/?p=4605"},"modified":"2015-04-13T17:26:18","modified_gmt":"2015-04-14T00:26:18","slug":"mark-watches-leverage-s04e16-the-gold-job","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/markwatches.net\/reviews\/2015\/04\/mark-watches-leverage-s04e16-the-gold-job\/","title":{"rendered":"Mark Watches &#8216;Leverage&#8217;: S04E16 &#8211; The Gold Job"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>In the sixteenth episode of the fourth season of <i>Leverage<\/i>, Hardison decides to run a job. Intrigued? Then it\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s time for Mark to watch <i>Leverage<\/i>.<\/p>\n<p><!--more--><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"line-height: 1.2rem;\">In hindsight, I don\u00e2\u20ac\u2122t think this is an easy episode to watch, and I appreciate that. It\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s a lot more fulfilling to me that we get a chance to see Hardison shine <\/span><i style=\"line-height: 1.2rem;\">and<\/i><span style=\"line-height: 1.2rem;\"> struggle with his own insecurities and shortcomings. That\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s the kind of well-rounded storytelling that I want from the fiction I consume. Hardison is flawed in his approach to conning the Madsens, but the show isn\u00e2\u20ac\u2122t cruel in displaying that. Instead, this becomes a learning opportunity for him, one that allows him to grow closer to the team and to Nate.<\/span><\/p>\n<p>But let me back up a bit. I obviously am going to love any episode that focuses so heavily on Hardison. LET\u00e2\u20ac\u2122S GET THAT OUT OF THE WAY. The opening scene demonstrated just how important he was to the team and how often they took him for granted. That\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s not a malicious thing, and the writers play this humorously. Without his technological savviness, they\u00e2\u20ac\u2122re left struggling to open a web browser. Of course, now I can see precisely where Hardison went wrong in conning the Madsens. As amusing as it was to watch him control this con, the clue to everything was right in the beginning. Why did he choose this specific job as the one he\u00e2\u20ac\u2122d run? Because it was so <i>simple<\/i>. Because it was risk-free. And then he proceeded to load that con with risks and complexity!<\/p>\n<p>Still, I can\u00e2\u20ac\u2122t deny that it was a whole lot of fun to see how he did this differently than Nate. He was more consciously organized, sometimes overly so. He wasn\u00e2\u20ac\u2122t quick to shut down suggestions and tweaks from the team, often incorporating them into the con if it suited it. But lord, I loved his use of video game theory the most. It was so fascinating to see how he designed a con meant to pique Barbara\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s interest in games. And aren\u00e2\u20ac\u2122t most games a con anyway? Aren\u00e2\u20ac\u2122t they manipulating us to care about things that ultimately aren\u00e2\u20ac\u2122t real and don\u00e2\u20ac\u2122t matter? So he sets up a treasure hunt, hacking Tommy Madsen\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s computer to put the idea of a \u00e2\u20ac\u0153treasure\u00e2\u20ac\u009d into his mind. He puts a fake relic into his hand, which then brought Barbara into the game.<\/p>\n<p>And then? Escalation. Every time the Madsens got a little bit more interested in this supposed fortune, Hardison\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s game gave them another obstacle. When that was overcome, the next obstacle was set, just a tad harder than the last. It\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s classic game psychology! Unfortunately, this is Hardison we\u00e2\u20ac\u2122re talking about. So I didn\u00e2\u20ac\u2122t find his failure to nab the marks to be out of character. Truthfully, his worst skill as a conman is his grifting. He\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s only good at being ridiculous, absurdly so. (Which was a clue to the ending anyway. What does Hardison do best as a grifter? He provides a distraction so the other members of the team can perfect their own heists or cons.) The final touch that this con needed, if it was ever going to work, was subtlety. And he blew it, overselling the property buy at the very end and causing the marks to doubt the veracity of it all.<\/p>\n<p>Like I said, it\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s not easy to watch, and I was very sad to see him fail like this. I <i>wanted<\/i> him to prove himself to the rest of the team. However, I was thinking about this all wrong, wasn\u00e2\u20ac\u2122t I? Hardison had <i>already<\/i> done this. He\u00e2\u20ac\u2122d won Eliot over long ago with Mr. Punchy, but did he <i>need<\/i> to win him over? (Actually, I feel like you need to perpetually win Eliot over, so maybe that\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s a bad example. HE\u00e2\u20ac\u2122S SO HILARIOUSLY ANGRY IN THIS EPISODE, I LOVE IT.) The truth is that Hardison long ago proved his worth to this team, and showing that he could lead it wasn\u00e2\u20ac\u2122t something they needed to trust and respect him. Still, Nate ultimately views this all as a chance to teach Hardison something about running cons, and I think that made this entire experience worth it. It\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s typical of Nate to do something like mailing Hardison a letter with the details of the con ahead of time. But it was also a great way to demonstrate why Nate\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s techniques work so often. He comes up with the simplest and most risk-free plan possible, no matter how dirty or boring it is, so that he always has a back-up. He never <i>starts<\/i> with a complex con like Hardison did here. Start simple, work it up, then make sure you\u00e2\u20ac\u2122ve got a net to catch you.<\/p>\n<p>Excellent advice.<\/p>\n<p>I also wanted to note that practically everything we see in this episode is real otherwise. Cash for gold business that use mail-in services? Totally real. The underground tunnels in Portland? Also real. AND VOODOO DOUGHNUTS. Jesus, y\u00e2\u20ac\u2122all, I cannot wait to go back there later this year so I can have a thousand of them.<\/p>\n<p>The video for \u00e2\u20ac\u0153The Gold Job\u00e2\u20ac\u009d can be downloaded <a href=\"http:\/\/markdoesstuff.com\/products\/mark-watches-leverage\" target=\"_blank\">here for $0.99<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p><b>Mark Links Stuff<\/b><\/p>\n<p>&#8211; The Mark Does Stuff Tour 2015 is now live and includes dates across the U.S., Canada, Europe, the U.K., and Ireland. <a href=\"http:\/\/markreads.net\/reviews\/tour-dates-appearances\/\" target=\"_blank\">Check the full list of events on my Tour Dates \/ Appearances page.<\/a><br \/>\n&#8211; My <a href=\"https:\/\/www.google.com\/calendar\/embed?src=815s3sbr8clhdi9tn8k7r3tim4%40group.calendar.google.com&amp;ctz=America\/Los_Angeles\">Master Schedule<\/a> is updated for the near and distant future for most projects, so please check it often.&nbsp;<b>My next Double Features for Mark Watches will be the remainder of&nbsp;<i>The Legend of Korra<\/i>, series 8 of&nbsp;<i>Doctor Who<\/i>, and <i>Kings<\/i>. On Mark Reads, Diane Duane&#8217;s <i>Young Wizards<\/i> series will replace the Emelan books.<br \/>\n<\/b>&#8211;&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/markdoesstuff\">Mark Does Stuff is on Facebook!<\/a>&nbsp;I&#8217;ve got a community page up that I&#8217;m running. Guaranteed shenanigans!<br \/>\n&#8211; If you would like to support this website and keep Mark Does Stuff running,&nbsp;<a href=\"http:\/\/markwatches.net\/reviews\/2013\/09\/help-keep-mark-does-stuff-running\/\">I&#8217;ve put up a detailed post explaining how you can!<br \/>\n<\/a>&#8211; Please check out the&nbsp;<a href=\"http:\/\/markdoesstuff.com\/\">MarkDoesStuff.com<\/a>. All Mark Watches videos for past shows\/season are now archived there!<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>In the sixteenth episode of the fourth season of Leverage, Hardison decides to run a job. Intrigued? Then it\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s time for Mark to watch Leverage.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[625],"tags":[626],"class_list":["post-4605","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-leverage","tag-mark-watches-leverage"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/markwatches.net\/reviews\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4605","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/markwatches.net\/reviews\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/markwatches.net\/reviews\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/markwatches.net\/reviews\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/markwatches.net\/reviews\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4605"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/markwatches.net\/reviews\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4605\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/markwatches.net\/reviews\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4605"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/markwatches.net\/reviews\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=4605"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/markwatches.net\/reviews\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=4605"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}<!-- WP Super Cache is installed but broken. The path to wp-cache-phase1.php in wp-content/advanced-cache.php must be fixed! -->