{"id":7465,"date":"2020-01-24T13:00:42","date_gmt":"2020-01-24T21:00:42","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/markwatches.net\/reviews\/?p=7465"},"modified":"2020-01-13T14:26:03","modified_gmt":"2020-01-13T22:26:03","slug":"mark-watches-monster-episode-41-the-ghost-of-511","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/markwatches.net\/reviews\/2020\/01\/mark-watches-monster-episode-41-the-ghost-of-511\/","title":{"rendered":"Mark Watches ‘Monster’: Episode 41 – The Ghost of 511"},"content":{"rendered":"

In the forty-first episode of Monster<\/i>, Grimmer tries to get the old director of Kinderheim 511 to tell him the truth. Intrigued? Then it\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s time fo Mark to watch Monster<\/i>.<\/p>\n

Trigger Warning: For brief mention of child abuse<\/b><\/p>\n

WHAT THE FUCK!!!!<\/p>\n

THIS EPISODE WAS A LOT. A whole lot! And yet again, Monster<\/i> was able to craft a compelling and frightening narrative WITHOUT A SINGLE MAIN CHARACTER ON THE SCREEN. Not one!!! Instead, \u00e2\u20ac\u0153The Ghost of 511\u00e2\u20ac\u009d focuses entirely on Grimmer and Petrov, and IT TRULY FUCKED ME UP. Part of that is because of the narrative sleight of hand that unfolds here. Because of what I\u00e2\u20ac\u2122d seen on the show back when Dieter was first introduced, I believed a very<\/i> specific narrative was unfolding. Actually\u00e2\u20ac\u00a6 there are multiple \u00e2\u20ac\u0153tricks\u00e2\u20ac\u009d here, because I can\u00e2\u20ac\u2122t ignore that, like Grimmer, I believed that Petrov\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s \u00e2\u20ac\u0153grandkids\u00e2\u20ac\u009d were just two boys. I COMPLETELY FELL FOR THAT, TOO.<\/p>\n

On top of that, Grimmer is definitely<\/i> hiding something. What that something is continues to perplex me, y\u00e2\u20ac\u2122all, and I don\u00e2\u20ac\u2122t even have a working theory. Initially, I thought that perhaps Grimmer was a survivor of Kinderheim 511, but he\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s too old; he\u00e2\u20ac\u2122d have to be the same age as Johan, and he\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s clearly not. But the intensity by which Grimmer pursues Petrov and this story is rooted in something significant. Is Grimmer dedicated to uprooting instances of wrongdoing? Is there something specific in this case that deserves the focus he\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s given it? I don\u00e2\u20ac\u2122t know, but my instinct is telling me that there\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s more to this.\u00c2\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

That\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s also partially because so much is not at all what it seems on Monster<\/i>, and I\u00e2\u20ac\u2122m trying to prepare myself for an inevitable twist. Because holy shit, this episode packs TWO huge emotional punches, the first being Petrov\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s \u00e2\u20ac\u0153grandchildren.\u00e2\u20ac\u009d Again: I made an assumption. We\u00e2\u20ac\u2122d already seen a previous teacher of Kinderheim 511 repeat the same offenses on another child: Dieter. So once Grimmer realized that Petrov was running a new orphanage, OF COURSE HE ASSUMED THE WORST. I certainly did! The man was trying to repeat those terrible \u00e2\u20ac\u0153personality correction\u00e2\u20ac\u009d experiments on a whole new group of kids, and he sought out orphans who were from difficult backgrounds, too. That made it easier<\/i> for him to get away with it, right? Only now I see how easy it was for me to see this narrative unfolding on screen. I bought right into it. Petrov had to be evil because he\u00e2\u20ac\u2122d already been<\/i> evil.<\/p>\n

Except\u00e2\u20ac\u00a6 holy shit. Y\u00e2\u20ac\u2122all. What if he told the truth in this episode? What if the \u00e2\u20ac\u0153experiment\u00e2\u20ac\u009d at Kinderheim 511 was<\/i> exactly what he said it was, and what if it was to help \u00e2\u20ac\u0153create\u00e2\u20ac\u009d kids who were happy? Obviously, I\u00e2\u20ac\u2122m still missing a lot of information, and hopefully all the data that Petrov granted Grimmer will fill in the gaps. Because once again, I have to question what I do<\/i> know. What if Kinderheim 511 wasn\u00e2\u20ac\u2122t a breeding ground for child abuse and experimentation? Or what if that experimentation had a positive intent? I DON\u00e2\u20ac\u2122T FUCKING KNOW ANYMORE. It\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s possible, I guess!<\/p>\n

I just have so many questions, y\u00e2\u20ac\u2122all. Who the hell was that woman? It looked like Nina, but why would she murder Petrov and his assistant, Anna? It doesn\u00e2\u20ac\u2122t make sense to me. What\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s the motive here? Was someone furious that Petrov told the truth? Are they related to the men who tried to kill Grimmer (or at least apprehend him) earlier? And what about that mindfuck of a reveal that Petrov WASN\u00e2\u20ac\u2122T trying to repeat the disastrous experiment that ended Kinderheim 511??? He was actually using LOVE as a basis for helping these young boys experience happiness? My god, that whole line about how using love was a new idea??? (I\u00e2\u20ac\u2122m paraphrasing badly.) And it was the introduction of Johan<\/i> that made the program turn south? So it was<\/i> working before he arrived? Who the hell was responsible for Johan being invited to Kinderheim 511, then?<\/p>\n

WHAT IS HAPPENING ON THIS SHOW???<\/p>\n

The video for \u00e2\u20ac\u0153The Ghost of 511\u00e2\u20ac\u009d can be downloaded here for $0.99<\/a>.<\/p>\n

Mark Links Stuff<\/b><\/p>\n

– The paperback edition of my debut, ANGER IS A GIFT, is now OUT!<\/a>\u00c2\u00a0<\/strong>If you’d like to stay up-to-date on all announcements regarding my books, sign up for my newsletter<\/a>! DO IT.<\/strong><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"